Answer:
A
Explanation:
I've done this test before
The correct answer is:
<em>Food, language and architecture. </em>
Explanation:
The history of Texas is a complex one, before being part of the United States, Texas was under Spanish control, followed by Mexican control. Nowadays the Spanish legacy still remains in this state. The most outstanding legacy is the language, while English is the primary language, Spanish is the second language spoken in Texas, and many towns have Spanish names like "El Paso".
Spanish conquerors also brought new food like lemons, limes and oranges. Texas architecture has also influence in the Spanish legacy with things like buttress, arches and towers.<em> Religion is also part of their legacy. </em>
Answer:
<em>Abraham Lincoln, John Breckenridge, John Bell, And Stephen Douglas</em>
Explanation:
<em>Abraham Lincoln → National Union Party → Lincoln was morally opposed to slavery </em>
<em>John Breckenridge → Democratic Party → Had publicly declared his opposition to "impairing in any form" the legal protection of slavery.</em>
<em>John Bell → Democratic Party → Bell opposed efforts to expand slavery to the U.S. territories.</em>
<em>Stephen Douglas → Democratic Party → Douglas believed that popular sovereignty would defuse the tension between the proslavery and antislavery factions.</em>
<em />
<em />
<em>I hope this helps!</em>
<em />
<em />
It was showed as a surplus because it was a surplus when it came to the budget. The problem behind it that for the first time in a while, the United States budget worked with a surplus after the year ended even though it was not the idea of a surplus that the people believed.
The surplus disappeared because it never really existed. It was a surplus but it didn't mean that the country was not in debt. The country had a huge amount of debt to other countries or to companies or to any other institution such as a bank. The surplus was eaten up by the debt accumulated over the years. There was a surplus, but the debt was not reduced.
Historians need to be worried about reports with bias in them because their reports do not accurately reflect history. Historians need to take many reports <span>into consideration when studying history.</span>
