Question

A growing community considers building a new hospital closer to residential neighborhoods. This will get residents to emergency care faster and save lives when it is
needed. The only land available near residential areas is a forested wetland that supports a variety of species. What is a social consequence of not using the land
for a new hospital?
Emergency care is farther away, risking the health and well-being of a growing community
Preserving the ecosystem may upset residents in a community with a hospital shortage.
O If the wetland is protected, residents have fewer environmental concerns about the area.
It protects the lives of species and prevents a reduction in carbon sequestering by the trees.

Answer 1

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Answer 2

The social consequence of not using the land is that it will protect the lives of species and prevents a reduction in carbon sequestering by the trees.

A social consequence refers to any unforeseen event which can be positive or negative, experienced by a society and has an effect on them.

A positive social consequence benefits a group of the socially connected group and can also stimulate future purpose.

A negative social consequence has its repercussions and can be attributed to negligence and bad factors.

Conservation of the ecosystem is paramount as well as the survival of the community.

A positive social consequence from the given information is that if the forested wetland is preserved to support a variety of species, It will protect the lives of the species and prevent a reduction in carbon sequestering by the trees.

The community could have emergency ambulances to cater for the movement of patients in case of emergency to the hospitals or educate them on how to take good care of their health and how to minimize hazards at home and offices.

Learn more about social consequences here:

brainly.com/question/3794486?referrer=searchResults