The difference between respect for cultural diversity and cultural relativism is that while cultural diversity encourages us to tolerate other cultures, cultural relativism precludes us from <u>passing judgment on any acts, even if they violate human rights.</u>
<u></u>
<h3><u>What is Cultural Relativism?</u></h3>
The idea of viewing a culture's ideas, values, and practices from within that culture is known as cultural relativism. It claims that there are no universal truths and that each culture must be understood on its own terms since they cannot be transformed into universally understood terms. Cultural relativism is the capacity to comprehend another culture on that culture's terms and, as a result, refrain from passing judgment on others based on the norms of one's own culture.
Learn more about cultural relativism with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14980769
#SPJ4
Assuming this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before for this question, the answer is that the Aztec were very self-sufficient but lacked the proper weapons.
Answer: Crop rotation
Explanation: crop rotation is a farming practice which employs a techniques of planting different crop types on a piece of land in successive manner. Growing corn on a piece of land in odd number of years and then soya beans on the same piece of land is a typical scenario of crop rotation practice.
Crop rotation practice is employed for a number of reasons which include ; Erosion control, Reduction parasite , weeds and diseases caused by plant pathogens. Crop rotation is also used to maintain soil fertility and ultimately boost crop yield.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Life would be totally different if the Confederate articles were amended. There would be no central government.</em> The articles of confederation were first adopted in 1777.
It went into full effect in 1781 however, it didn’t last long. The Confederation articles were finally restored by the <em>Constitution of the United States on the 4th of March, 1789. </em>
Every state would have their own militias. Each state would be independent and could not be delegated to Congress.
They could not regulate taxes or commerce. <em>These were a few of the reasons the articles of confederation could not last long</em>.
