Answer:
Functional
Explanation:
In psychology, the term functional conflict refers to a type of conflict that arises in a group but that ultimately leads to a positive result or outcome. A conflict can be functional when it leads to an open discussion between the members of the group and they can come up with new ideas or come to an agreement about their differences.
In this example, the members of Tyler's work team disagree about the best way to complete their project. They argued about it but then they came up with an exciting new idea and they reached a consensus and their project was a success. We can see that t<u>he original conflict and disagreement led to an open discussion that led to new ideas and they ended up with a positive result (the project was a success). </u>Therefore, their initial arguing is an example of a functional conflict.
D so you know the value of your currency
Answer:
b. Two thirds of Congress and three fourths of the states must approve of an amendment federally while in Florida amendments are proposed through election ballots and ratified by the people.
Explanation:
A constitutional amendment is an improvement, correction or revision of the original content of the document that is in use. Since 1789, the Constitution of the United States of America has been amended twenty-seven times and these amendments were ratified after two-thirds of the congress approve the proposal and sent it to the states. Three-fourths of the states is what is needed to affirm the amendment that has been proposed.
In Florida, amendments are proposed through election ballots and ratified by the people. This can be effected when there is a call by the simple majority approval of a voter initiative asking for a convention.
Career Resilience is what its called
Answer:Avoid prejudging the speaker
Explanation:
Listening is crucial when we interact with others because through listening we accumulate knowledge.
It is vital part of listening to avoid prejudging the speaker as part of ethical listening, one needs to pay attention and carefully decode tue message before they can make judgements about the message of the speaker. It is not ethical to reject the message without having actual heard the message effectively.
Sophia just heard the accent of the speaker and from that she concluded without hearing the message first that she wasn't going to hear the speaker.
