Answer:
C. strictly liable for Will's injuries
Explanation:
In law, Strict liability is a situation when defendant is required to be responsible to a certain situation, but can't be considered as guilty to any violation.
There are two points that need to be highlighted from the case above:
1. Astor Manufacturing process has fulfilled all of its safety regulation for storing the dangerous product.
2. The dangerous product owned by Astor Manufacturing caused William's injury.
The regulations for hazard management is created by the government, and the leak is not caused by their negligence. It's caused by unexpected natural disaster. This is why we can't say that Astor is guilty to any violation.
But still, the chemical that they created injured William. The court will most likely force Astor to be responsible for all the medical expenses incurred by william.
Answer:
The semi annual rate is 4.88%
Explanation:
semi annual rate = [((1+r)^(1/n)) -1]
= [((1+10%)^(1/2)) -1]
= 4.88%
Therefore, the semi-annual rate (i.e. periodic return per six months) do you require (i.e. need to earn such that this implies 10% earned per year when you get to compound semi-annually) is 4.88%.
Answer: E (Both B & C)
Explanation:
As a staff in Coca-Cola, the number one brand in the world, Externally providing buyers with what they perceive as superior value and Internally performing value chain activities differently than rivals and building resources and capabilities that they cannot readily match - is infact the main reasons Coca-Cola have stayed as the major player in the food and beverage industry.
Answer:
compliance risk
Explanation:
Compliance risk -
It refers to the risky situation , which can be due to some financial forfeiture , legal penalties , loss of material , when the company fails to follow the rules and regulations , is referred to as compliance risk .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question,
The correct type of risk involved is compliance risk .
