Answer:
The Third choice- Δpqr is an equilateral triangle
Explanation:
If you put it on the graph and make the triangle on the graph. You get your answer.
There are different variations in population size. The best reason why the simulation of the sampling distribution is not approximately normal is that The sample size was not sufficiently large.
<h3>What takes place if a sample size is not big enough?
</h3>
- When a sample size taken by a person or a researcher is not big or inadequate for the alpha level and also analyses that one have chosen to do, it will limit the study statistical power.
Due to the above, the ability to know a statistical effect in one's sample if the effect are present in the population is greatly reduces.
See full options below
Which of the following would be the best reason why the simulation of the sampling distribution is not approximately normal?
A The samples were not selected at random.
B The sample size was not sufficiently large.
с The population distribution was approximately normal.
D The samples were selected without replacement.
E The sample means were less than the population mean.
Previous question
Learn more about population size from
brainly.com/question/1279360
Ok, so first you have to count le 15% off. It means you pay 85% of the price
0,85•65= 55,25$
Second, you take the 10$ off
55,25-10=45,25$
Third, you have know what percentage of the original price you paid
45,25 divided by 65 =0,6962
So you actually paid 69,62% of the original price
<span>A contagem de pontos no voleibol é realizada da seguinte forma:
Para ter um ponto é necessário, uma sequência de ações de jogadas onde
tenha o toque no saque, até o momento em que a bola estiver fora de
jogo.
Faz cair a bola, no piso da quadra adversária;
Se fizer isso, sem que nenhum atleta adversário toque na bola e a mesma caía no chão, é ponto, ACE...
Atleta pisou na linha da quadra "zona de ataque" entre a rede é INVASÃO é ponto para o adversário...
A equipe adversária comete uma falta ou uma penalidade; </span>
Answer:
The benefits are that Aaron will be more productive, which will lead to more output, as well as increased human capital as a result of his videos. The costs to Aaron are the time and money to take the course, along with any forgone income that could have been earned during this time.
Explanation:
If Aaron chooses to take the course, he will become better educated in his work, making economics content. However, the costs he will endure will be the cost of the course itself, the time to learn the new concepts, and the revenue he could have generated from making more videos instead of taking the time off to take the course.
The benefits society will gain if Aaron completes the course is being able to watch better quality videos made by Aaron. The videos will then help workers work more efficiently, increasing productivity and economic growth.
<em>Hope this helps!</em>
