C.
If he's called a great chief, he must be great, strong, and brave.
<span>True</span>
<span>
</span>
<span>Dialogue certainly is the best
method to use when analyzing a character because we can learn so much. Let’s say you are reading a story where the
main character reads a sign a person standing on a street corner is holding
that says, “Can you spare some change?”
After reading that sign, the main character walks up to that person and
yells in his face, “Why don’t you go get a job!?” What can be learned from this interaction? What can be deciphered from this is that the
main character is insensitive to the plights of others and apparently incapable
(or unwilling) to see things objectively and from a perspective other than his
own so much so that he jumps to conclusions and feels the person is just lazy
when, in fact, the person may have just recently lost a job, has bills that
need immediate paying, and/or is perhaps waiting for unemployment benefits to
become active while looking for a new job.
As you can see, thus, dialogue can be quite useful in analyzing a
character.</span>
The five adjectives in the sentence presented above are “<em>six</em>”, “<em>orbiter's</em>”, “<em>three</em>”, “<em>bright</em>”, and “<em>red</em>”. The explanation is the following:
“six”: The definite numeral adjective “<em>six</em>” modifies the noun “<em>seconds</em>”.
“orbiter's” and “three”: The genitive case “<em>orbiter’s</em>” is used as an adjective, together with the definite numeral adjective “<em>three</em>”, to modify the noun “<em>engines</em>”.
“bright” and “red”: The adjectives “<em>bright</em>” and “<em>red</em>” are used to modify the noun “<em>flames</em>”.
<span>When using an editing checklist to review your paper, you should
</span><span>focus on one or two errors at a time
so that error may be corrected
so correct option i conclude from above is A
hope it helps</span>
