Answer:
When the war ended, the two super powers had two very different ideas of how Europe should be reconstructed.
Answer:
I believe it's all of the above but I'm not 100% sure but most of the time it will be all of the above
Answer:
With the Act of Supremacy of 1534 of the king, Henry VIII makes England a Protestant country and can divorce Catherine of Aragon to marry Anne Boleyn
Explanation:
The marriage of Henry and Anna, as well as her subsequent execution, made her a key figure in the political and religious upheavals that marked the beginning of the Reformation in England.
At the time of the meeting with his future lover in 1522, Henry VIII was married to Catherine of Aragon, who gave birth to the the only surviving child, Mary (the future Queen of England, Mary I, known as Mary the Bloody), and was in a relationship with her lovers: Bessie Blount and Maria Boleyn.
Not getting, being married to the queen, the long-awaited male heir, Henry VIII cooled down to his wife, who disappointed him, relations with constant favorites got bored. Having met Anna, the king became interested in her. Having received consent from Anna to become his wife, Henry VIII began to search for a solution to divorce Catherine of Aragon. It is likely that the idea of annulment of marriage (not divorce in the modern sense) came to Henry much earlier than meeting Anna and was motivated by his desire to have an heir to ensure the stability and legitimacy of the Tudor dynasty on the throne of England. In 1531, he asserts his supremacy over the English Church. The king stripped the church of the privilege of non-jurisdiction and the privilege of levying taxes on wills, the largest source of income for the church. Thus, the formation of the Church of England was legislatively fixed, in which all the secular and doctrinal power was concentrated in the hands of the monarch. This gave him the opportunity to invalidate the marriage with Catherine.
Answer:
The answer I’m positive is C.
Explanation:
An exile
Hope this helps!
Please give me brainliest!
The correct answers are "It grew out of work of a statesman named Solon".
Solon wanted to promote a system that pushed equality and active participation from all citizens in government. He gave Athenians the right of serving in assembly gatherings. These changes represented a significant cange of paradigm to a certain extent towards democracy in Greece.
Every citizen of Athens who owned some kind of property was able to participate in the assembly. <u>Even though you were poor, you could still own a house and be able to serve politically</u>,
<u>Athenians who were in a situation of debt, were restrained from voting but they weren't enslaved.</u> The only slaves they had at the time were foreign.
All males who owned property <u>were free to serve but not obligated</u>.
You could say Greek democracy set things up for an improvement towards political equality, but still continues to be seen as a sort of "collective tyranny".<u> Political decisions were made by majority vote, and this often led to the poor overpassing common welfare, rendering the system a false democracy. </u><u>So even though Greek democracy did push many advances, it also had plenty of crucial flaws it couldn't overcome</u>.
Hope this helps!
