The answer is <u>b) It increased federal intervention in the affairs of independent states.</u>
By the time these federal Acts were enacted in the U.S., several Northern states had already abolished slavery but it was legal in the Southern states. The Fugitive Slave Acts of 1793 and 1850 allowed for the capture and return of runaway slaves within the territory of the United States, aiming to prevent that the Northern states would become safe havens for runaway slaves.
The last act was more rigid in their provision and stated more regulation, including the guarantee of harsher punishments for anyone interfering in runaways slave's capture, the right of slave owners and their “agents” to search for escaped slaves within the borders of free states and compelled citizens to assist in their capture as well. It also denied slaves the right to a jury trial, among others.
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 implied much government's intervention in the state's affairs, and this angered most northern states. They responded by intentionally neglecting the law or creating acts that nullified or that protected black people, the so-called "personal liberty laws", and by making great efforts to assist runaway slaves, among others.
Answer:
Cleveland learned that the treaty did not have the support of Hawaiians.
Explanation:
Grover Cleaveland was a former two times United States President between 1885 to 1889 and again between 1893 to 1897 was at time refuse to sign the treaty that allowed the United States to annex Hawaii. The reason behind his refusal was that he learned that majority of native Hawaiians did not want to be annexed.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is "Cleveland learned that the treaty did not have the support of Hawaiians."
In 1766, Franklin testified in the British Parliament against the Stamp Act of 1765, which required that all legal documents, newspapers, books, playing cards and other printed materials in the American colonies carry a tax stamp.
Frederick Douglass (born Frederick Augustus Washington Bailey; c. February 1818 – February 20, 1895 was an American social reformer, abolitionist, orator, writer, and statesman. After escaping from slavery in Maryland, he became a national leader of the abolitionist movement in Massachusetts and New York, gaining note for his oratory and incisive antislavery writings. In his time, he was described by abolitionists as a living counter-example to slaveholders' arguments that slaves lacked the intellectual capacity to function as independent American citizens. Northerners at the time found it hard to believe that such a great orator had once been a slave.
The right answer is: B) The church issued(...)secular law. As secularization does not annul the religious character, it is different from the absolute dispensation of vows; this is also an indulgent measure, but in cancels the vows and their obligations, and the dispenser is no longer a religious.
