All categories

3 years ago

What is the difference between charismatic leadership and transformational leadership?

Business

2 answers:

Pavlova-9 [17]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Charismatic leaders also are sometimes called transformational leaders because they share multiple similarities. Their main difference is focus and audience. Charismatic leaders often try to make the status quo better, while transformational leaders focus on transforming organizations into the leader's vision

Hope it helps

ololo11 [35]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The difference between charismatic leadership and transformational leadership is: Charismatic leadership gravitates around the leader and the persona of the leader. Transformational centers around a common vision and focuses on improving and evolving all team members to reach another level.

You might be interested in

6. Why do American business owners try to avoid accepting Canadian coins?

fenix001 [56]

Answer:

because America coins and Canada coins is same

Explanation:

pls mark this

3 0

3 years ago

Determine whether each of the following topics would more likely be studied in microeconomics or macroeconomics. Microeconomics

tatuchka [14]

Answer and Explanation:

Economy is divided into two main fields: Microeconomics and Macroeconomics. Microeconomics studies the decisions of individuals and businesses while Macroeconomics is in charge of analyzing the economy as a whole including decisions made by governments and their countries. Thus:

A) The effect of government regulation on a monopolist's production decisions (Macroeconomics).

B) The optimal interest rate for the Federal Reserve to target (Macroeconomics).

C) The government's decision on how much to spend on public projects (Macroeconomics).

4 0

4 years ago

Hart Attorney at Law experienced the follwoing transactions in 2016, the first year of operations:

Korolek [52]

Answer:

I used an excel spreadsheet since there is not enough room here.

Explanation:

Download pdf

6 0

3 years ago

Teresa purchased a necklace for $100 in 1964. In 2014, Teresa gave the necklace to her granddaughter, Lindsey.

padilas [110]

Answer:

d)$1,100 long-term capital gain

Explanation:

Given the information from the question. We know that a long-term capital gain or loss comes from investment that was possessed for a year or longer. However in this case, since the necklace was a gift .Therefore, there were no capital gain in 2014. In 2016, Lindsey sold the necklace for $1200. Therefore, the capital gain on the necklace will calculated as $1200- $100 = $1100. Where the $100 is a cost purchase for the previous owner. Therefore, long-term capital gain is $1100 which is option D.

8 0

4 years ago

Problem 3.22: Trade Deficits and J-curve Adjustment Path Assume the United States has the following import/export volumes and pr

Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

The pre-devaluation cost is ($880) and the pst-devaluation trade balance is ($1398)

Explanation:

Assumptions Values

Initial spot exchange rate, $/fc $2.00

Price of exports, dollars ($) * 20.0000

Price of imports, foreign currency (fc) * 12.0000

Quantity of exports, units * 100

Quantity of imports, units * 120

Percentage devaluation of the dollar 18.00%

Price elasticity of demand, imports * (0.900)

a. The pre-devaluation trade balance--

Revenues from exports, $ $2,000

Expenditures on imports, fc * 1,440

Expenditures on imports, $ $2,880

Pre-devaluation trade balance ($880)

b. Resulting trade balance immediately after devaluation

Revenues from exports, $ $2,000

Expenditures on imports, fc * 1,440

New spot exchange rate, after devaluation $2.36

Expenditures on imports, $ $3,398

Post-devaluation trade balance (currency contract period) ($1,398)

8 0

4 years ago