Answer:
the project's MIRR is 13.50 %.
Explanation:
MODIFIED INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (MIRR)
-It is the rate that causes the Present Value of the Terminal Value (Future Cash flows at the end of the Project) to equal Present Value of Cash outflows.
-MIRR assumes a reinvestment rate at the end of the project
The First Step is to Calculate the Terminal Value at end of year 3.
Terminal Value (FV) = Sum of (PV x (1 + r) ^ 3 - n)
= $350 x (1.11) ^ 2 + $350 x (1.11) ^ 1 + $350 x (1.11) ^ 0
= $431.24 + $388.50 + $350.00
= $1,169.74
The Next Step is to Calculate the MIRR using a Financial Calculator :
(-$800) CFj
0 CFj
0 CFj
$1,169.74 CFj
Shift IRR/Yr 113.50 %
Therefore, the MIRR is 13.50 %
Answer:
15,251 units
Explanation:
The formula for Economic order quantity is;
EOQ = √2DS/H
Where,
D = Annual demand = 4,212
S = Ordering cost = $177
H = Holding cost = $27/4,212 = $0.00064102564
EOQ = √ 2 × 4,212 × $177 / $0.00064102564
EOQ = √ $1,491,048 / $0.00064102564
EOQ = √232603488.37
EOQ = 15,251 units
Answer:
<span> 1) If a producer can provide cable service more cheaply than another producer, it is an</span> absolute advantage.<span>
2) If a producer can produce salads while giving up fewer opportunities to make sandwiches than another producer, it is a</span> comparative advantage.
3) If a producer can create more car parts than another producer does, using the same number of resources, the price per unit is cheaper and it is an absolute advantage.
Absolute advantage<span> is the ability of a person, a country, company or region to produce a good or service at a cheaper price per unit than another entity producing the same good or service.</span>
Comparative advantage<span> is the ability of a person, a country, company or region to produce a specific good or service more efficiently (lower opportunity cost) than another entity to produce the same good or service.</span>
Answer:
c) 48,000
Explanation:
<em>Equivalent Units</em>
To apportion cost between work in progress and completed units in a particular period, we use equivalent units. Equivalents units are notional whole units which represent incomplete work and are used to apportion cost between completed units and work in progress
<em>Equivalent Units = Degree of Completion × Units of products</em>
<em />
<em>Item units workings E.U</em>
Finished products 45,000 100% × 45,000 = 45,000
Closing WIP 5000 3/5 × 5000 = 3,000
Total equivalent unit 48,000
Equivalent unit for the conversion cost= 45000 +3000= 48,000
Answer:
Answer of each requirement is given seperatly below.
a What is the value of Siebel using the DCF method?
Value under DCF = CF * (1+growth rate)/ (WAAC" -Growth rate)
Putting values (assuming after tax earning is all in cash)
Value of SI = 25 (1+6%)/ 20%-6% = 189 million dollars
"WAAC calculation
Here WAAC is equal to cost of equity (ke) as company is debt free.
so
Ke = risk free rate + beta (risk premium)
= 5 + 2.5 (6) = 20%
b What is the value using the comparable recent transactions method?
Based on recent tansaction the value of siebel incorporated will be calculated as shown below
Value of SI = Profit afte * 10 = 25 * 10 = 250 million dollars
Publicly-traded Rand Technology, a direct competitor of Siebel's sale is taken as bench mark.
c What would be the value of the firm if we combine the results of both methods?
By combining value of both value technique we get 189 + 250 = 439 million dollars.
