1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LuckyWell [14K]
2 years ago
8

In what practical way did war bonds benefit citizens who purchased them? The military did not draft anyone who bought bonds. Bon

d purchasers did not have to ration as much as others. Bonds helped many business owners make higher profits. The government repaid bond purchasers with interest.
History
2 answers:
Gnoma [55]2 years ago
8 0

The correct statement is," Bonds benefited the citizens who purchased them in a way that the government repaid the bond purchasers with interest." The correct option is D.

Bonds are such securities issued by the government or any other body to procure or raise funds, and interest is payable on them at a predetermined fixed interest rate.

<h3>Bond instruments </h3>

  • Bonds are an instrument issued by a borrower to the public who subscribe to them as a token of proof that the borrower has raised such amount from the investor, payable at a fixed time period.

  • Bonds generally are beneficial as they are comparatively secured investments than the equities and debts and give more interest than any bank deposits or saving accounts.

  • Bonds may be issued by a Government or any other corporate body to raise funds for a specific purpose, which is payable at a fixed rate of interest predetermined at the time of issue of such securities.

Hence, the correct option is D that the government benefits the purchaser of bonds in the way of repaying such bonds with interests to its subscribers.

To know more about bond instruments, click the link below

brainly.com/question/4577522

Usimov [2.4K]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The government repaid bond purchasers with interest.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The video you just watched revolved around a poet's interpretation of the moment Julius Caesar chose to cross the Rubicon River.
stellarik [79]

Alea iacta est ("The die is cast") is a variation of a Latin phrase (iacta alea est)  attributed by Suetonius to Julius Caesar who pronounced it in the year 49 B.C. when he was leading his army across the Rubicon river in the current territories of Northern Italy. Subsequently, he entered in Italy heading his army and defying the Roman Senate and it meant the beginning of the civil war versus Pompey and the Optimates.

  • Plutarch, referred to the same event in his written testimonies and reported the phrase but stating it was pronounced in Greek instead of Latin and that its translation meant: <em>'Let the die be cast'.</em>
  • Suetonius described the same situation, reporting a very similar phrase but not exactly the same. Let's include the exact excerpt of his writings where he did so.

<em>Caesar: '... iacta alea est,' inquit.</em>

<em>Caesar said, "The die has been cast."</em>

Thefore there are two very similar versions of the same historical events. Usually the Latin version is the most widely known, as the Latin language was more widespread all over Europe and gave rise to all the current family of Latin languages (Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, etc).


3 0
2 years ago
When the reporter describes how fast the car that won the race was traveling, he is describing the __________ of that car.
nikklg [1K]

Answer:

When the reporter describes how fast the car that won the race was traveling, he is describing the <u>speed</u> of that car.

The car's speed is how fast the car was going.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was the main writer of the Declaration of Independence
ololo11 [35]

Hey there!

"Who was the main writer of the  Declaration of Independence?"

The main writer of the Declaration of Independence was:

\bold{Thomas}    \bold{Jefferson} \bold{\checkmark}

Good luck on your assignment and enjoy your day!

~\bold{LoveYourselfFirst:)}

5 0
3 years ago
I will make brainliset
Elina [12.6K]

Explanation:

Baptism is a public ceremony conducted by Christians where one person either dunks another person in the water or, as some denominations practice, sprinkles or pours water on a person’s head. History is filled with people who were not baptized. Galatians 2:7 to 9. Some receive only a few words. In this case, however, the… There are three ways by which denominations baptize people today: sprinkling, pouring, and immersion. Luk 8:15 “But the seed in the good soil, these are the ones who have heard the word in an honest and good heart, and hold it fast, and bear fruit with perseverance. Getting baptized is a big decision, and people make that decision for a variety of reasons. I think generally people who make the effort and commitment to go to church regularly are more likely to commit in other ways, such as baptism, whereas those who are not … We should be baptized because it is what Jesus commanded and it is a sign and seal of our faith in Him. 28:18-20), yet there is much disagreement about who should be baptized. The more we read about God’s anger of the unrepentant sinner, the more God’s grace is amazing. There are no “good people” who can merit their own salvation by good works.

4 0
2 years ago
1. Fill in the speech bubbles with at least one argument for each proposal.
lisov135 [29]

In order to fill the speech bubbles with an argument for each proposal, we must first understand a little more about the argumentation process, which must contain a specific reason for your ideas, such as a criticism and concrete facts.

Now let's create at least one argument for each following proposal:

<h3>Delegate who believes the nation should have a single executive:</h3>

We believe that the nation should be led by a single executive, that is, by a single supreme leader, who is the president of the republic, in order to generate greater compliance, speed in processes and a leadership figure before the people.

<h3>Delegate who believes the nation should have a three-member executive:</h3>

The dissolution of the single power of the chief executive into three members will create a greater sense of democracy in the essential choices for the nation, reduce the totalitarianism with which the president can present himself and increase international relations.

Therefore, to create a persuasive argument, it is necessary to adopt a discourse focused on ideas that generate benefits, solve problems and a fact-based way.

Find out more information about argumentation here:

brainly.com/question/3775579

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is it important that king David united the tribes to Israel?
    15·1 answer
  • What political system, developed by the romans, had the biggest effect on western political thought?
    8·1 answer
  • Hey yall I'm need help
    13·2 answers
  • Who elects the Speaker of the House of Representatives?
    7·2 answers
  • Who ratifies amendments to the constitution? <br> a. national <br> b. state <br> c. local
    5·2 answers
  • What were the effects of the Magna Carta on English government? Check all that apply.
    5·1 answer
  • What factor explained Florida's 6 year wait to have it to a quest for statehood approved?
    12·1 answer
  • "I found Rome a city of bricks, and left it a city of marble.”
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Explain the problem with the Election of 1796.
    10·1 answer
  • 17. How did the American economy of the 1920s differ from the economy of the 1930s?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!