The correct answer is "C: He trained long-range snipers that struck terror in the hearts of his opponents."
Pancho Villa was a revolutionary general and one of the most important figures in the independence of Mexico. He was widely known to be a brilliant tactician on the battlegrounds. Instead of using traditional military formations, he adopted alternative "guerilla" style tactics, trying to evade direct open-field contact with the enemy.
He would fill a locomotive with explosives and send it into the enemy's depot where it would subsequently explode and leave the enemy short on supplies. he would also train snipers in order to inflict fear in these enemies, as they felt helpless while seeing their comrades fall with and no enemies to be seen.
Answer:
Done and Done
Explanation:
POSITIVE:Dubbed "Flagellum Dei" (meaning "Scourge of God" in Latin), Attila consolidated power after murdering his brother to become sole ruler of the Huns, expanded the rule of the Huns to include many Germanic tribes and attacked the Eastern Roman Empire in wars of extraction
NEGATIVE:The mere mention of the name Attila the Hun conjures nightmarish images of a demonic barbarian leading his hoards on a rampage of pillage, and death across the lands of the Roman Empire. A closer look at the 5th century AD military leader, while not disputing his barbarity, offers a glimpse into the complexities of his nature and the fascinating adventures of his life. Here are 40 facts about the Attila the Hun that help shed some light on this frightening, complex character
hope it helps :)
a) one argument that barton makes in the passage is that historians cannot recreate a new history just because they don't want britain or europe being in the center of world history, and such acts will only vandalize history. The passage talked about 'de-center' Europe from the world history will present many problems, and this meant that we should learn the right history and we shouldn't focusing on making history what we like.
b) one cultural or economic development in the late 20th century that explain the "impending decline of the west" was the decolonization events, which led to many European countries to become less powerful since they cannot get as much money from their colonies anymore like they used to. which led to many new nations with new cultures forming, not the blind triumphalism of the old modernization theory of inevitable progress towards westernization.
c) one cultural or economic change in the late 20th century that historians who supported the process of de-centering world history would cite as a limitation was the soviet union's success in the middle east, which supported barton's argument in the 2nd paragraph where "westernization is inevitable".
