1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksju [112]
2 years ago
9

Which statement BEST describes the Boston Massacre?

History
1 answer:
rosijanka [135]2 years ago
5 0

The statement that BEST describes the Boston Massacre is: B) It was a protest that resulted in the deaths of 5 civilians.

The Boston Massacre was a protest that occurred on the 5th day of March 1770.

A mob of American colonists attacked several British soldiers throwing sticks, stones, and snowballs on them. This led to retaliation by the British soldiers who killed 5 colonists.

The Boston Massacre was a turning point in the tension that existed between the colonists and the Royal army. It spurred the American revolution.

Learn more about the Boston Massacre here:

brainly.com/question/7829931

You might be interested in
Which pronoun indicates first-person point of view? A. i. B. he C. She D. you
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
The correct answer would be : A. i

I hope that this helps you !
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS<br> PLZ EXPLAIN
Salsk061 [2.6K]

D is the closest answer. The problem was that the naval oil reserves were located in Teapot Dome Wyoming and these reserves were secretly transferred to the Mammoth Oil company. There was no bid. There was no fairness in the transaction. It was motivated mostly by greed, it seems. Harding's administration was riddled with problems. This was just one of them.

5 0
3 years ago
Who were the black elite of the early nineteenth century? How did they contribute to the
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

In the United Kingdom, the black community has largely consisted of immigrants and their descendants whose residency in the country dates from either the time of the old Empire or that of the new Commonwealth. Persons classified as being of African descent have nevertheless been a recognizable component of British society since at least the Elizabethan period.

An elite developed within the community over the course of several centuries. Its ranks were increased over time by the mixed-race children of colonial British aristocrats (such as Dido Elizabeth Belle),members of the older black elites of British Africa and the Caribbean (such as Sara Forbes Bonetta), the rise of black and mixed-race national leaders (such as Paul Boateng), and the success of numerous black and mixed-race persons in specialized industries, such as the arts (for example, Lenny Henry).

Like their counterparts in the United States and elsewhere, members of the black elite historically took part in the campaign to abolish slavery in the empire. Some, like former enslaved African Olaudah Equiano, even became politically prominent by way of their efforts.

Following the abolition in the early 1800s, black people continued to gain prominence in Britain's social, political and cultural life. Mary Seacole was a heroine of the Crimean War, and Learie Constantine was an important cricketer.

Today, Britain's black and mixed-race people are included in the annual Powerlist - a ranking of the nation's most prominent people of colour. A number of them, such as Boateng and Henry, are also peers and/or knights of the realm.There is also a small community of British aristocrats that are of partially black descent. Emma Thynn (née McQuiston), the Marchioness of Bath as the wife of the 8th Marquess, belongs to this sub-group. Another notable member is the mixed-race royal Archie Mountbatten-Windsor, the son of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

United States

8 0
3 years ago
Why would a historian find this biased source of information
Marina86 [1]
Could you give me more information so I can answer your question.
7 0
3 years ago
What Constitutional provision allows protestors to gather on the National Mall to protest lack of civil rights?
Tamiku [17]

Answer:

Freedom of Assembly

Explanation:

Freedom of Assembly often referred to as Freedom of Peaceful Assembly, is the United States Constitutional Provision which gives individual the right to gather and in a group voiced their opinions, promote, pursue, and defend their mutual or joint ideas.

In other words, Freedom of assembly is defined as a form of framework of the individuals right to protest. It is included in First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Hence, Freedom of Assembly is the Constitutional provision that allows protestors to gather on the National Mall to protest lack of civil rights

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Conservatives of the early 1800s believed in
    9·1 answer
  • Why was Carnegie a captain of industry?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following are true of the Federalist Papers? Select all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • What is nationalism?
    13·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from a speech to the Georgia legislature by Henry McNeal Turner in 1868 and answer the
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following about Heinrich Schliemann is true? A. He was born in Russia B. He discovered Troy C. He was a professiona
    7·1 answer
  • Explain how the slave trade impacted the people and places around the world. You can use the following list of categories to hel
    13·1 answer
  • The birth of Hinduism occured in this empire
    6·2 answers
  • _______________ originally received a contract by the Spanish Government to settle families of the United States in Mexico.
    11·2 answers
  • What did galileo demonstrate in his leaning tower of pisa experiment?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!