Answer:
<h3>
<em><u>i</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>'</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>k</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>v</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>o</u></em></h3>
Explanation:
<em>s</em><em>o</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>g</em><em>a</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em> </em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em>e</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>w</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>o</em><em>o</em><em>,</em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>y</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>e</em>
A settlement made with the aid of using a minor is frequently voidable, however a minor can most effective keep away from a settlement all through his or her minority popularity and for an inexpensive time after he reaches the age of majority. After an inexpensive length of time, the settlement is deemed to be ratified and cannot be avoided.
- Facts of the case: Sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. At age 19, he wants to void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17.
- Rule of Law: Minor's Contracts are voidable at the option of Minor.
- Analysis: Since, Minor's Contract is voidable at the option of the Minor who Signs the Contact can either honor the contract or void the contract. A minor can void a contract for lack of capacity, only when he is still under the age of majority. If a minor turn 18 i.e., After attaining Majority and hasn't done anything to void the contract, then the contract can no longer be voided.
- Here, Sean has not done anything to void the contract on attaining the age of 18. So, he at the age of 19, cannot void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the agreement at 17.
- Decision: Sean Vs. Sportswear Company: In the light of the above provisions, a Court will not permit Sean to now void the agreement.
Learn more about minority popularity here:
brainly.com/question/14457086
#SPJ4
Answer:
$28,800
$25920
Explanation:
Depreciation expense using the double declining method = Depreciation factor x cost of the asset
Depreciation factor = 2 x (1/useful life)
2018 = 2/5 x 72,000 = 28,800
Book value = 72,000 - 28800 = 43,200
2019 = 2/5 x 43200 = 17280
Book value = 43200 - 17280 = 25290
Explanation:
In this case, the ideal is to reject a task that is not mandatory in your contract. The boss's attitude in this situation was somewhat sexist, as it reduced the professional skills of a female investment analyst to having to be liked and serving coffee to bankers, since the professional was there to make a great professional presentation.
These unprofessional attitudes can be combated with an assertive attitude, without the professional feeling cornered by the possibility of suffering reprisals, but it is by maintaining an ethical, professional attitude and imposing respect, that it is possible for such unethical acts to be combated and not accepted any more. formal work environment.
Answer: Single-use plan
Explanation:
Single use plan is one of the method that helps in addressing the different types of organizational situation that helps in achieving the specific goals of the firm.
The budget, program, strategy and also the projects are the different types of single use planning process.
According to the given question, Dale is one of the design engineer in the manufacturing organization and dale is used to preparing the various types of plans with the proper resource and the overhead estimation.
Therefore, The dale is preparing the single use plan.