Answer:
Option A is correct which states that".There is no such thing, in IASB standards, as a "contingent asset"
The result of this mistake on the order form is that Khan's Crickets should verify from Camille the actual order amount intended.
We may factor in the fact that the number of crickets will show the correct quantity that Camille requires, then Khan should supply only the quantity on the order form and request for a corrected or revised order form from Camille.
Thus, the result is that Khan's Crickets will still supply crickets with an invoice worth $1,000, not adhering to the mistaken total sum.
Related link for similar mistake on order form at brainly.com/question/17251413
Answer:
In other words, if Neha decides to keep the $300 for a cell phone and Teresa decides to contribute the $300 to the public project, then Neha would receive a total benefit of:
$570.
Explanation:
Neha has, in this situation, maximized his benefits to the detriment of the public good. This is an illustration of the tragedy of the commons. The tragedy of the common is an economic problem that explains the loss that the society incurs when some persons like Neha neglect to contribute to the common good because they are solely concentrated on pursuing their individual goals for personal gains.
