Being multinational organisations the IMF, World Bank and WTO can start programs that not only would focus on providing shelter, food and clothing to the poor but also a good and sustainable source on income. By providing a sustainable livelihood to these poor people these organisations would them be able to provide themselves making them able to no longer rely on charity and donations in order to survive their daily lives. By having a sustainable source of income these poor people can have the ability to gain money which then can be used to buy their own food, clothing, shelter and education. The most important thing that money would give to these poor people is education. Through proper education these poor people would increase their knowledge enabling them to be qualified for higher paying jobs.
One of the ways in which ancient Native American leaders were similar to ancient Egyptian leaders is that "<span>Leaders of both cultures controlled the local economy," although in very different ways. </span>
The cattle would be brought to the railroad. Railroad would ship cattle to the east.
Bring cattle to the railroad would be called a cattle drive.
(Make sure and eat some good grub on the chuck wagon.)
Later spur lines would bring the trains, closer to the cattle, and the drives would be shorter.
A great western writer is name Louis La'Loumour. (Fiction stories, but utterly amazing.)
<span>George Washington spoke out often against Factions </span>
Sorry, my first answer was deleted. I can re-word it in a way where it won't be though.
The Congress (Legislative branch) decides when it is time for the electoral college to vote
(U.S. Constitution, Article 2)
hope this helps.
