This is one of the most complicated and debated issues in 20th century American history. Many historians argue that the killing of President Kennedy had a few particular results:
1. Increased tensions between the U.S. and Soviet Union. At the time of Kennedy's killing, he was is the midst of negotiating a peace treaty with the Soviets, a treaty that was not supported by the following administration.
2. An increased American military presence in Vietnam. President Kennedy was considering pulling American military advisors out of Vietnam. His death, many historians feel, indirectly lead to the Vietnam War.
3. A sense of paranoia and distrust in the American government from American citizens. In the years following the death of President Kennedy, many Americans came to doubt the official story of Kennedy's death and believed that the government was hiding information from the public.
Answer:
The strengths of excluding other groups gave black people a stronger voice for what they wanted and not what other groups think they wanted. Black people were able to express themselves more comfortably this way. While when other groups were included, they were able to share their opinions and feel included, especially if they supported what black people were doing.
The weaknesses of excluding other groups could have made other minorities (Asian, Native American, etc.) feel as if they were not as worthy of being heard. White people may have felt a certain way about not being able to express and spread their sympathy with the black folk.
Involving everyone was an effective tactic. Even if some people were not black, it let them express their disapproval of segregation and it showed the nation that not all white people were racist and believed the nation should be split.
<span>Roman-style domes became more widespread.</span>
Answer:
Benefits:
- Access to a larger market
- Increase in production of goods
Costs:
- Loss of jobs in developed countries
- Depletion of natural resources.
Explanation:
On the one hand, a global market means that a company or firm can potentially reach a larger market to sell its products and services. And in turn, make more profit. On the other hand, it also means that the competition is global and that a firm has to compete in this larger market with hundreds of firms. This often means that to be competitive, companies have to lower their costs. One easy way of doing that is by outsourcing or moving parts of their production process to countries with lower salaries. This leads to the loss of jobs in the home countries.
The increased competition and the larger market also mean that more goods are produced at a better price for the customer. However, this production can easily get out of hand and deplete natural resources.
They check there answers using history, like they use primary sources etc.
