Answer:
 Zola's gross income is worked out under community property state;
Explanation:
community property state
Dividends ($1200/2)                               $600
Interest on certificate of deposit  ($900/2)     $450
Salary               ($80,000/2)                          $40,000
Gross income                                         $41,050
Under community law system, all the property is deemed to be community property and is held jointly by the spouses unless the property is acquired before marriage or inheritance or gift.
For federal tax purposes, each spouse is taxed one and half of the property belonging to community. Therefore Zola is taxed 50% for the incomes of her spouse as well including the interest on certificate of deposit.
 
        
             
        
        
        
The answer is C.
Purose full behavior states that people make decisions with a desired outcome in mind, taking all the losses and benefits into consideration.
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
the annual pre-tax cost of debt is 10.56%
Explanation:
the beore-tax component cost of debt will be the actual market rate of the bonds, as they offer an interest rate of 11% but are selling at 104 points not at par thus, there is a difference between the rates.
We solve for the rate which makes the coupon and maturity 104
with excel or a financial calculator
PV of the coupon payment
 
 
C	5.500 (100 x 11%/2)
time	60 (30 years x 2 payment per year)
rate	<em>0.052787474</em>
 
 
PV	$99.4338 
PV of the maturity
  
  
 Maturity   100.00 
 time   60.00 
 rate  <em>0.052787474</em>
  
  
 PV   4.57 
<em><u>Adding both we should get 104 which is the amount the bonds is selling:</u></em>
PV coupon $99.4338 + PV maturity  $4.5662 = $104.0000 
The rate is generated using goal seek or wiht a financial calculator.
This rate is a semiannual rate, so we multiply by 2 to get the annual cost of debt:
0.052787474	x 2 = 0.105574947
The cost of debt for the firm is 10.56%
 
        
             
        
        
        
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The journal entry is shown below:
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the journal entries for the given data are as follows:
Petty cash A/c Dr  $236
To Cash A/c $236  
(Being establishment of the fund is recorded ) 
Office supplies A/c Dr  $94
Misc. Expense A/c Dr $89
Cash Over / Short Dr $22              ( $236 - $31 - $89 - $94)
To Cash A/c  $205                         ( $236 - $31) 
(Being Reimbursement of the fund is recorded)