Answer:
t = 3c - 5
Step-by-step explanation:
The relation between c and t is linear as the increase of the value of t is uniform for each unit increase in the value of c.
Now, any two points on the graph of the t = f(c) equation are sufficient to determine the equation.
Let the points are (2,1) and (3,4).
So, using two points formula of straight line we get the equation is
⇒ t - 4 = 3(c - 3)
⇒ t - 4 = 3c - 9
⇒ t = 3c - 5 (Answer)
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.