Answer and Explanation:
The Journal entry is shown below:-
Cash Dr, 1969.80 (2010 × 98%)
Sales discount Dr, 40.20
To Account receivable $2,010 ($2,200 - $190)
(Being the entry is recorded)
Here we debited the cash and sales discount as it increased the assets and we credited the accounts receivable as it reduced the assets
Answer:
The answer is: C) Investment spending by businesses varies inversely with the interest rate.
Explanation:
This statement is true all the time. When a company evaluates the costs and benefits of an investment, interest rate plays a fundamental part in those calculations. The two basic reasons for that are:
- The higher the interest rate a company (or any individual) has to pay for a loan, the harder it is for the company to repay the loan.
- The interest rate a bank charges is usually correlated to the opportunity cost of an investment. The higher the interest rates banks charge, the higher the internal rate of return (which is used to calculate the Net Present Value of an investment) will be. This is because banks don´t print money, they take in deposits and then they loan the money the someone else. So if the interest rate the bank charges is high, usually the interest rates the bank pays for the deposits is also high. Instead of investing, a company might just put their money on the bank and earn a better return rate.
Answer:
Net present value $1,363.50
Explanation:
The computation of the net present value of B is shown below:
Year Cash flows PVIFA factor at 15% Present value
0 -$15,600 1 -$15,600
1 0 0.8696 0
2 0 0.7561 0
3 25,800 0.6575 $16,963.50
Net present value $1,363.50
Answer:
The interest revenue will Savor record in Year 1 on this lease at 9% is $347,697
Explanation:
Present value of Lease Payment = $4,561,300
Less: First Payment on Jan 1, 2018 = $698,000
Remaining Balance = $3,863,300
Interest Revenue for Year 1 at 9% = $3,863,300 × 9%
Interest Revenue for Year 1 at 9% = $347,697
Answer: B. Cats in a bag
Explanation:
oligopolistic firms is a small number of firms who realize that they all constitute such a small number of firms that they enjoy a lot of power together. so together they are cats in a bag.