Answer:
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. suggests that a man free of any restrains have the potential of defying the government.
Explanation:
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. wrote his short story "Harrison Bergeron" based on a dystopian society where in the name of equality, people are intentionally mad 'handicapped'. The protagonist of the story Harrison was a man of exceptional qualities but he had to wear disguises so that he can be equal with the rest.
This story is a sort of political metaphor that seems to suggest what will happen when people actually break free from the shackles of governmental controls. Harrison also broke free of his disguises and proclaims himself to be "Emperor", trying to free the others of their "handicaps". The "Empress" ballerina, the musicians and the others in the television studio all had handicaps on them too, which Harrison began to tear apart. But in the end, Harrison and his "Empress" were killed by the Handicapper General, Dina Moon Glampers.
When Harrison took hold of control over the government's "equality" disguise, he was able to free some of their "handicaps". This momentary short lived freedom is suggestive of a person's ability to defy the government. But then, some freedoms don't last long and the restrain continues.
Answer:
A. Context
Explanation:
The introduction establishes an argument's context: it informs the audience of the issue at hand, the prevailing arguments from opposing sides and the position.
Your thesis should clearly and specifically state the setting's role in the work and how it is established.
Writing an effective argument follows certain steps: Introduce your argument by setting the context.
The answer is c im pretty sure all the rest are fragments
The second one.., Since Avonlea occupied.
This gives the setting by telling where the story took place.
Answer:
PART A: Which statement identifies the central idea of the text? A Both articles depict severe political and social conflict in Bosnia, and while some supported the archduke, other were willing to go to extreme means to inflict harm on the rival Austrians. B Both articles are in agreement of the archduke’s bravery in the face of the attack on his life and the life of his wife. C Both articles agree that the assassination of the archduke and his wife was nothing more than a senseless act of violence. D Neither article can agree on the cause for the violence enacted on the archduke and his wife.
Explanation:
PART A: Which statement identifies the central idea of the text? A Both articles depict severe political and social conflict in Bosnia, and while some supported the archduke, other were willing to go to extreme means to inflict harm on the rival Austrians. B Both articles are in agreement of the archduke’s bravery in the face of the attack on his life and the life of his wife. C Both articles agree that the assassination of the archduke and his wife was nothing more than a senseless act of violence. D Neither article can agree on the cause for the violence enacted on the archduke and his wife.