The two details that BEST support this idea are: A. 3 and 4
<h3>What is a supporting detail?</h3>
Supporting detail is a piece of evidence that lends credence to a central point.
If the central point of the text is that the California School for the Deaf, Riverside’s football team has unique advantages over other teams, then pieces of evidence should be given to prove it. Options 3 and 4 provide credible evidence.
Learn more about supporting details here:
brainly.com/question/11669714
Answer:
See explanation for answer.
Explanation:
I believe the correct answer for this question would be, In a famous article, travel agent Donald Workman asserts that: “It’s simply wrong to visit Paris without going to the top of the Eiffel Tower. It may even be illegal.” (The second choice)
I hope this helps!
Have a lovely day!
Answer:
Contrast
Explanation:
They are opposites of one another.
The correct answer is 4. No, because he digresses into another topic and does not address historical knowledge.
Explanation
At the beginning of the paragraph, the author announces the sentence "In no other department is a thorough knowledge of history so important as a philosophy". However, nowhere in the paragraph does he develop this idea, on the contrary, he mentions other issues such as the relationship between philosophy and other fields such as exact inqury, the arts (as he mentioned in "on the other hand, in touch with exact inquiry, while, on the other, it has a certain relationship with art"), natural sciences, metaphysical principles, among others. From the above, it can be inferred that the correct answer is 4. No, because he digresses into another topic and does not address historical knowledge.
