Question

3. What do you think would happen if an art critic did not describe the subject he was critiquing? (1 point)

Answer 1

If an art critic does not specify the subject he is criticizing, it would confuse those who read his criticism and people would not understand his criticism (option B).

What is art criticism?

Art criticism is a concept that refers to the value judgment expressed by a critic about one or more works of art. Art critics generally focus on the aesthetic aspect. However, some include in their criticism references to its relevance in a given social and political context.

According to the above, if a critic does not specify the work that he is criticizing, the public that reads his criticism will not be familiar with the reasons for his criticism. In other words, he will not understand his/her criticism and he will not be able to discern or establish an opinion based on the critic's criticism.

Learn more about art in: brainly.com/question/982099

Answer 2

Answer:

B

Explanation:

because when you describing the art work then the person who created the art can correct you and ur still try to understand the concept