1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alekssr [168]
2 years ago
13

PLEASE HELPS

English
2 answers:
lina2011 [118]2 years ago
8 0
B did the authors use the same points if comparison
dexar [7]2 years ago
7 0

Answer: The authors had opposing views. 2. Yes and no. In the text, "The Case for Mars" by Alexander Fisher, the text talks about how humans going to Mars would be better because robots take longer to examine Mars and the robots could break. The text, "Mars- A Waste of Time and Money" by Juniper Springs talks about how robots are just as compatible as humans to be going to Mars. The two authors also used the topic of one's health as persuasion. Juniper Springs argued that the radiation levels could have long term effects on people who went to Mars while Alexander Fisher argued that the radiation levels weren't immediately lethal. In short, the two authors both used the topic of robots going to Mars and one's health as reasons for their opinions. 3. The authors supported their views in similar ways. 4. Alexander Fisher focused more on emotion and appeals in his writing. And Juniper Springs focused more on logic in his writing.

Explanation:

hope this helped. I had this assignment not too long ago.

You might be interested in
Readers can tell that a text is a nonfiction when it
Svetlanka [38]

Answer:

Includes many elements of fantasy

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct answer.
Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

a. It builds on the narrator's

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Will Give Brainliest If answer soon
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

I think it would be question 4 not sure

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the excerpt from
charle [14.2K]

Answer:

The ironic part is where it says "thought we were going to have to get on without you, tessie"

Explanation:

This only becomes ironic after the reader has finished with the story and can understand what has happened because at the end Tessie "wins" the lottery.

7 0
3 years ago
From the “Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass” Frederick Douglass returns to his former master to ask if he can be given
krek1111 [17]
True that is so true frederick was tired of being slaved

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 2.16 Graded Assignment: Book Review
    13·1 answer
  • Which excerpt from “Raymond's Run” best shows that Squeaky admires people who are serious about doing their best?
    8·2 answers
  • Which is the correct answer? <br><br> i attached an image.
    15·1 answer
  • Why is it important to consider cultural and social factors in diagnosing a person as having a mental disorder?
    11·1 answer
  • Which is included in the story "the child of urbino" but not included in the Biograph of Raphael
    11·2 answers
  • Please answer 13 it’s due in a couple of hours ASAP
    9·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
    10·1 answer
  • How does Sarah'voice her concern?
    6·2 answers
  • Why has the pandemic been good for some black entrepreneurs?
    7·2 answers
  • Who fixed the 1919 world series in the great gatsby.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!