Answer:
The work also tackles the complex relationship between Ireland and the anti-slavery movement. Douglass’s hosts in Ireland were mostly Quakers, many of whom were shielded from – and sometimes complicit in – the famine that was gripping the countryside. Similarly, many Irish in America were willing participants in slavery. Douglass’s meeting with Daniel O’Connell spurred the Irish leader to encourage the Irish community in America to support African-Americans in their fight against oppression. But his overtures went largely unheeded by the Irish political and Catholic community in the US, eager to ensure that their own people secured opportunities in their adopted country. The irony is captured in Kinahan’s work. In an interaction between Douglass and an Irish woman about to leave Cork for America, he informs her that the Irish had not always treated his people well. She replies: “Well then they’ve forgotten who they are.”
But ultimately, the work is concerned with exploring this important moment in Douglass’s life and its role in his development as a thinker and activist. As Daugherty says, Douglass’s experience in Ireland widened his understanding of what civil rights could encompass. “Douglass was much more than an anti-slavery voice. He was also a suffragette, for example, an advocate for other oppressed groups.”
Douglass himself captured the impact of his Irish journey in a letter he wrote from Belfast as he was about to leave: “I can truly say I have spent some of the happiest moments of my life since landing in this country. I seem to have undergone a transformation. I live a new life.”
Explanation:
Patrick Henry opposed<span> the U.S. </span>Constitution<span> because he believed that it gave too much power to the central government at the expense of the state governments.</span>
Answer:
2. Online classes provide more flexibility in students’ schedules.
5. Students learn valuable skills they can apply in online college courses.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option B is your answer (He defeated the forces left behind by Alexander The Great)
Explanation:
because the Maurya empire was ruled by the Maurya dynasty from 322 - 185 BCE, and by 316 BCE they had fully occupied northwestern India and defeated the satraps left by Alexander The Great. Chandragupta Maurya was the Mauryan ruler who defeated Alexanders general Seleucus nicator and received the territories of Kabul and Balochistan in 305 BC. I found this on the lesson of this test, I am 100% sure this is your answer. Hope this helped.
Answer:
There are three good reasons:
- Byzantium was going to be a new power center well suited for the control of the eastern territories of the Roman Empire that had become so vast.
- The location was strategic: a point midway between Europe and Asia, and the control of the Bosphorus Strait, the way communicating the Black Sea and the Mediterranean.
- Byzantium was going to be the end tradepoint of the Silk Road that connected Asia and Europe in the trade of species and other valued products at the time.
- We could add another good reason, which is the proximity to the holy places of Christianity in Jerusalem.
Explanation:
