Answer:
The 1856 Republican National Convention nominated a ticket led by Frémont, an explorer and military officer who had served in the Mexican–American War. Frémont opposed the expansion of slavery.
Explanation:
The peasants would be unable to provide enough for the quotas and so their goods were simply taken away from them and instead were given to the cities and the military. Millions of peasants as a result would starve to death and would end up moving to the cities where all of the food was being sent.
Antifederalist saw the Constitution as a way for the Federalist to gain more control over the states. This was seen as the opposite for the Federalist Party because they just wanted to create a central government that was strong enough to run the whole country. The Antifederalist Party was totally against the ratification because they were afraid that the national government would become too powerful and take advantage of their power. The Federalist Party was for the Constitution because they saw it as a way for the people to get more involved in the government since the most powerful branch would be directly linked to the people. Lastly, the Antifederalists saw the Constitution as a way to take the power of the states away while the Federalists interpreted the Constitution as a way for the states and the national government to have similar powers that still allow the national government to handle national affairs rather than having the states do it.
Answer and Explanation:
Nevada and US constitution are the set of laws that aim to normalize and create guidelines to be followed in their territories. These constitutions have many similarities, such as the affirmation that all men are equal, the confirmation of freedom of business and religion, defends the concepts of the declaration of rights, does not present laws ex post facto and defends the right to carry out peaceful protests.
However, these two constitutions have some differences. The nevada constitution is bigger and more detailed, it has never been modified and presents the original text until today, unlike the constitution of the USA.
