C and d have to do with the upper classes and how they (mostly) utilized labor. Populists were more concerned with how to make things work for them (a bit cynical on my part).
The progressives (particularly women and labor leaders) were very concerned about working conditions and how to improve them.
B<<<< answer
Answer:
1.) A common explanation is that the Civil War was fought over the moral issue of slavery. In fact, it was the economics of slavery and political control of that system that was central to the conflict. A key issue was states' rights
2.) The new United States government was thus free to acquire Native American lands by treaty or force. Resistance from the tribes stopped the encroachment of settlers, at least for a while.
Answer:
My short answer is no.
Explanation:
However, I believe this question is a little bias depending on who you ask. Theoretically, I believe that this event can also be classified as a revolution. I think this because the war was a defining point for the freedom of slaves in America. Let me know if you need more clarification.
<span>A. Jakarta
</span>
It is an Island of Indonesia and also densely populated.
Answer:
4. claimed to be both Roman emperor and pope
Explanation:
The term designates a political system seen in the Eastern Roman Empire. The Byzantine emperor was both the head of the state and head of the Church. He was the supreme authority in religious affairs. Nevertheless, the concept of caesaropapism is largely inaccurate; many current scholars estimate that nothing in the Byzantine Orthodox doctrine states that the emperor was infallible (like the Roman pope, according to Catholic dogma).
