The best answer is:
"To make sure that other citizens get fair trials."
They help bring opinions and supervise the trial. They have a say in what happens in a court case- this is important. They can bring different points of view and make sure the judge, or people in the trial, aren't being biased or using uncredible facts or information.
I hope this helps!
~kaikers
Answer:
The cases were about racial segregation.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education(1954) was a Supreme Court case which ruled that children's racial segregation in government's schools was illegal. The decision by the Supreme court showed that everyone is equal despite their colour or religion.
Milliken v. Bradley(1974) was a Supreme Court case in the United States regarding the outlined desegregation of busing among public school students in Detroit. There was a plan to blend students of different races in United States public schools following the decision made in Brown v. Board of Education (1954). The decision was the opposite of the decision made in Brown v. Board of Education as segregation was encouraged.
The court refused to remedy unequal and separate education. Children need to learn together and understand each other. I believe voters who disagreed with the ruling could have made a peaceful protest regarding the decision made. Also, since the public schools were mainly funded by taxes, the people who opposed the decision could have refused to pay tax in order to voice their opinions on the issues.
Gold had been discovered on the land that the Cherokee lived on.
Answer: Friedrich Hayek’s work The Road to Serfdom argued that centralized Economic Planning ultimately threatened liberty. Conservatives used this book to justify a reduced role for the state in the economy, by equating fascism and socialism with the New Deal.
Explanation: Frederick Hayek in his book <em>The Road to Serfdom</em>, published in 1944, criticized government involvement in the market seeing it as a system that leads to loss of individual freedom.
Centralized Economic planning is key to socialism as a method to ensure equality, but Hayek argued that central planning forces the will of a few people on the public. This is not socialism but dictatorship.
Conservatives, who favored a reduced government role in economic planning quoted this book and equated the New deal with fascism. The New Deal was a program designed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt to revive the economy after the Great Depression.
