The appropriate response is the National Organization for Women. It is the biggest association of women's activist grassroots activists in the United States. Presently has several sections and countless individuals and activists in every one of the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
<span>The Laws of man are to be based on the laws of God. </span>
Answer: C) so that Japan could gain dominance of the Pacific region.
Well, this question cannot really be answered generally. It's a matter of judgement, and it's best judged for particular cases. The consideration of this depends on two factors:
what are the probable costs (in terms of human life, and the quality of human life) of the invasion? - it's important not to diminish these factors, as the assessments of casualties often tend to be lower than the actual numbers
how high is the risk of the alternative. Do we have a good, unbiased reason to believe that a spread of nuclear weapons (unchecked spread, or spread that gives reasons to worry. US has a lot of nuclear weapons, but since it's not planning to use them on other country, it wouldn't be justified to attach the US) will happen? what kind of conflict are we risking?
in any case, this is not an easy question, and perhaps there will never be a good answer for it.
Individual citizens elect legislators, who create public policy. Media organizations influence individual citizens and interest groups influence legislators, so they indirectly have a very great influence on public policy. Political parties dominate the legislative branch, and legislators generally follow the platform of their parties.
Note: Foreign diplomats do not have as great or official an influence as those listed above, but they do play a role in pursuing policies that benefit their own country.
