District courts, circuit courts, and the supreme court. District courts are the local trial courts. Circuit courts are the court you go to when you appeal. Finally the supreme court is the final level of appealing.
Don’t know for sure but get this app called socratic it will help you!
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
A). They are winner-takes-all elections.
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
The reason why answer choice "A). They are winner-takes-all elections" is the correct answer because this is what our local, state, and federal elections use to elect someone for office.
The term "winner-takes-all" pretty much means who ever wins get everything, in this case the position in office. The winner-takes-all is implemented in the election because the person that has the most votes would win, so they would take the position in office.
The U.S has been using the winner-takes-all method for many years. This allows people to choose a representative that they think would be the best in office for the city, state, or country.
For example, the U.S President election runs by the "winner-takes-all" method because which ever candidate has the most electoral votes wins, or they just need to hit the 270 electoral votes to win. This is how "winner-takes-all" works in the elections.
<h3>I hope this helped you out.</h3><h3>Good luck on your academics.</h3><h3>Have a fantastic day!</h3>
The correct answer is the IRS Data Retrieval Tool.
Explanation:
The IRS Retrieval Tool allows students as well as parents who have filed a US tax return with the Internal Revenue Service to use the IRS tax return so that they can complete free application.If the person is eligible to use IRS Data Retrieval Tool they can get certain benefits that is it is one of the easiest way to provide the tax return information. The student will not need to provide a copy of his or his parents tax return to the college.It is one of the best way to ensure that FASA has accurate tax information.
Answer:
universalist
Explanation:
Universal ethics refers to the moral philosophy generally applicable to all mankind and therefore transcends culture and personal impulse. They prescribe responsibilities for all, they describe privileges for all, they list virtues for all. It's the argument that ethical values hold for everyone and not only for some, that is, without exception, for all. It is the meta-ethical stance that a universal ethic extends to all people, irrespective of their culture, ethnicity, age, faith, nationality, sexuality, or other distinguishing characteristics. Therefore the stand of the United States laws forbidding business people to bribe others even in cultures where bribery is necessary reflects the universalist view of ethics.