The two different interpretations you are referring to are known as a strict and loose interpretation of the Constitution. Here is more information about both.
1) Strict interepretation- Individuals who favored a strict interpretation of the Constitution stated that in order for Congress or the President to act, the right they would be performing must be written into the US Constitution.
2) Loose interpretation- Individuals who favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution stated that the Constitution is flexible and there is room for broad interpretation. Essentially, these people argued that some powers in the Constitution are "implied."
One of the biggest problems was that the national government had no power to impose taxes. To avoid any perception of “taxation without representation,” the Articles of Confederation allowed only state governments to levy taxes. To pay for its expenses, the national government had to request money from the states.
https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-us-government-and-politics/foundations-of-american-democracy/challenges-of-the-articles-of-confederation/a/challenges-of-the-articles-of-confederation-article
I think it might be Malone but I'm not exactly sure
Answer:
I would write how and why they developed and write about the thing they developed whatever it is
