Athens and Sparta
Explanation:
- The National Assembly (Appeal) was made up of all Spartans over 30 years old.
- Assembly elected state officials, ephors, geronts and military commanders and decided on their dismissal.
- It was formally the highest authority. She voted on proposals concerning war, peace, alliances, citizenship and deprivation of citizenship. Only the basileus, the ephors, the geronts and the foreign deputies were allowed to speak here.
- In Athens, as in Sparta, there was a national assembly - the Ecclesia.
- It consisted of all free Athenian citizens. In the oldest period it did not play a significant role in the management of Athens.
Learn more on Ancient Greece on
brainly.com/question/842463
brainly.com/question/90931
brainly.com/question/90931
#learnwithBrainly
Socialism can be corrupted and has been often throughout history. Many dictators promise to deliver socialism only to provide more of a communist or totalitarian government if anything. Also, even if true socialism was delivered, there are many who fear that their standard of living would decrease. For the (very) wealthy, they are likely not to favor socialism due to the fact that their wealth would be redistributed to those in need. There are probably other reasons why someone may not like socialism, but I'm not sure at the moment. Hopefully this is a good starting point for your assignment or essay. Of course you should look into further research on this topic.
Answer:
Archaea and bacteria are both prokaryotes, meaning they do not have a nucleus and lack membrane-bound organelles. They are tiny, single-cell organisms which cannot be seen by the naked human eye called microbes.
Explanation:
Answer:
I think its important because it's a religion where the lake was found and geologists havent observed in any summer so it's cool since no one observed it yet
Answer:
Check Explanation
Explanation:
In Question one. The passage illustrates a response to European colonialism when Syed Ahmad Khan mention that the European occupation of India has brought peace between the Muslims and the Hindus. In his speech to the Muslim community in Meeerut, he said “Now, suppose that all the English and the whole English army were to leave India, taking with them all their cannon and their splendid weapons and everything, then who would be rulers of India? Is it possible that under these circumstances two nations—the Muslims and the Hindus—could sit on the same throne and remain equal in power? Most certainly not". In the passage, he illustrates that the Muslims and the Hindus will not tolerate each other in the aspect of Government and that the English occupation has brought peace between the two religion
ONE way in which the circumstances of the speech might have affected the author's argument in the passage are the words he said about the ropes of Government. He said that "For the successful running of a democratic government, it is essential that the majority should have the ability to govern not only themselves but also unwilling minorities". This words affected his argument. He was speaking on the possibility that if the Europeans were to leave India, it Hindus and the Muslims can't formed a peaceful goverment together, while again saying that a democratic goverment has the Ability to control not only the majority but also the minority. In is speech, he stated that both were of different Nationality and therefore both can not formed a goverment together but he fail to realize that he was also against his point when he laid down the attributes of a Democratic goverment
In his Author' views, the European ideologies influenced the development of Indian society in the nineteenth century through the new ideologies made by the aims and objectives of the Indian National Congress which they presuppose that the various religions, castes, and ethnic groups of India can all be treated alike and all of them belong to the same nation. It can also be seen in the general acceptable goverment of democracy which which was being enforce in India by European.
