Answer: The physician is being sued. Insurance company should provide an attorney. If the doctor is negligent, insurance company should pay (that's why we have premiums). Dr. Z is sued, goes to agency, and notifies the agency. The agency doesn't notify Aetna in right amount of time, and also notifies the wrong company. Aetna doesn't have a liability because they were not notified in a timely manner. Larson is agent to Aetna. A principal's notice to agent=notice to principal. That's the same as notifying Aetna according to its claims procedure. This is not Dr.Z's problem. Aetna is wrong in denying coverage, and Dr.Z will succeed and not have to pay.
A i believe , hope this is correct for ya
Bailiff, prosecutor, ranger, forensic scientist
Answer:
What? Does its a question
Fraudulent license means that the license was obtained through illegal means. In this case, when someone has a fraudulent license, it is very problematic because he or she may be charged with different legal cases, or worse, may face revocation. Fraudulent license is considered as a criminal case so the punishment is also heavy. Cases like this involves identity theft. This would undergo thorough investigation which prevents the person from resuming his normal living.
