Answer:
I personally believe that it depends on the person and their improvment. There are over a million people in the U.S. prison system for minor drug offenses. If they release people according to level of offense, then I believe that it can be justifiable. If they are under house arrest, pay fines, and do counseling, and participate in daily community service it is comprehensible in my opinion.
Explanation:
Answer:
where is the question?????
There are other options in the case when defendant admits to the crime (of killing the victim)
Explanation:
In case the defendant accepts to have committed the crime of killing the victim, he can be given a thought of receiving some leniency in the punishment.
The counsel of the concerned defendant can argue in the court of law, that act was in a fit of rage, or haste of anger and was entirely not pre-meditated. He can further arague that feeling guilt of the crime, the defendant admitted to his crime hence he should be subjected to a lenient term.
Answer:
I tried, Sorry If it isin't right
Explanation:
Answer:
actus reus, mens rea, concurrence, causation, and harm
Explanation:
