1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kondaur [170]
2 years ago
11

.............................................................

History
1 answer:
AnnZ [28]2 years ago
4 0

Hello...

.........................

You might be interested in
5. which of the following is true in comparing the Philippine-American war to the Spanish-American war?
PIT_PIT [208]
1. C. <span>fewer american soldiers fought in the Philippine-American war than the Spanish-American war.
</span>2. D. <span>the united states would become more involved in Latin America and keep European countries out.
</span>3. I don't know, sorry
4. C. <span>The warring powers interfered with the U.S right to freedom of the seas
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
PLS ANSWER ASAP 20PTS
Savatey [412]

Answer:

1st and 4th

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What is an abolitionist and what reform do they stand for?​
asambeis [7]

An abolitionist is someone who is against Slavery and wants to abolish it

3 0
3 years ago
Using your economic knowledge and your research, compose a 350- to 450-word editorial that evaluates the effectiveness of these
NemiM [27]

Answer:

The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.

According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.

The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.

The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Why were griots important to African societies?
Akimi4 [234]

Answer:

The importance of Griots lies in their role as cultural diffuser.

Explanation:

Hello!

Griots are very important people in all the cultures of western Africa.

The main task of a Griot is the verbal transmission of traditional songs, which he recites in social events, such as weddings or baptisms. The griot must not only possess vocal skills, but also know in detail the history and current events, which he uses in his performances.

The griot gets paid to do this job.

Success in your homework!

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • #5 Please help!!!!!!
    13·2 answers
  • What did the marshall court interpret the necessary and prper clause to mean?
    5·1 answer
  • How were convicts viewed in the penal colonies
    13·1 answer
  • In Article 1, Sections 2 and 3, the Constitution declares that Congress _____.
    10·2 answers
  • 2. If the German mark is valued at $.435 in U.S. dollars, how may marks could one get for $50 in U.S. dollars?
    10·1 answer
  • Developed and advocated the use of the scientific method?
    14·1 answer
  • Which wartime idea of Lincoln would most align with his second inaugural
    12·1 answer
  • Organize each of the following details into the appropriate categories in the chart. Note: Some options may be used more than on
    6·1 answer
  • West African empires were incredibly wealthy because...
    10·1 answer
  • What name did alexander the great give many cities?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!