All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following should not be part of the informed consent form.

SAT

1 answer:

saw5 [17]3 years ago

4 0

The option among the given ones that should not be part of the informed consent form is;

A. Name of the researchers and the institution affiliated with.

<h3>Informed Consent</h3>

To answer this we need to understand informed consent which is a process of getting someone's permission before conducting a certain activity with respect to such a person.

Now, in this informed consent, there is usually a form that is filled by the participant(s) to make sure they consent to the activity to be carried out. The details will include the name of the participant, the title of the study and purpose of the study.

It is pertinent to also note that there will have to be anonymity of the participants.

In conclusion, the correct option is A.

The missing options are;

A. Name of the researchers and the institution affiliated with.

B. Name of the participants and the institution affiliated with.

C. Anonymity of the participants and their responses.

D. Title of the study and purpose of the study.

Read more about informed consent at: brainly.com/question/14600637

You might be interested in

Based on the structure of the passage, which event most directly caused city authorities to try to outlaw plays? New plays were

Juliette [100K]

Answer:

The answer is D, The Puritans were enraged.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which is an example of a cultural block?

Harman [31]

Answer: a. a gender bias

6 0

3 years ago

Frank, who lives in texas, and his sister lilly, who lives in japan, correspond regularly. From what he can tell from the postma

ehidna [41]

Answer:

(A) There is convincing evidence that there is no difference in the mean delivery times.

(B) There is convincing evidence that there is a difference in the mean delivery times.

(C) There is convincing evidence that the mean delivery time from Japan to Texas is greater than the mean delivery time from Texas to Japan.

(D) There is not convincing evidence that the mean delivery time from Japan to Texas is greater than the mean delivery time from Texas to Japan.

(E) The t-test cannot be used for sample sizes that are this small.

Explanation:

The correct option is;

(A) There is convincing evidence that there is no difference in the mean delivery times.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we have the formula for the two-sample t-test given s;

To Texas N₁ = 12, =8.74 σ₁ = 2.92 SE Mean₁ = 0.84

To Japan N₂ = 9 = 6.75 σ₂ = 2.56 SE Mean₁ = 0.85

t = 1.667

Where the null hypothesis is

mu To Texas = mu To Japan and the alternative is

mu To Texas > mu To Japan

Here since the observed P value of P = 0.058 is greater than the significance level of 0.05 we fail to reject the null hypothesis and we will therefore, not accept the alternative hypothesis.

Hence, there is convincing evidence that there is no difference in the mean delivery times.

3 0

2 years ago

Need Assistance With This

Lesechka [4]

Answer:

Explanation:

23 - (9 - 5)^2 = 23 - 4^2 = 23 - 16 = 7

3 0

3 years ago

Define these words from Act III, Scene 2. inexplicable: discretion: buffet:

quester [9]

The meaning of the words has been described below:

Inexplicable: This means something that is puzzling or inexplainable
Discretion: This is the application of wisdom and discernment
Buffet: An arrangement of meals

<h3>What is the meaning of "Inexplicable?</h3>

Something that is inexplicable leaves a person puzzled about a situation or issue.

In the same vein, discretion refers to the application of wisdom when solving a difficult matter. In restaurants and parties, buffets are often used to serve meals.

Learn more about the meaning of the word, inexplicable here:

brainly.com/question/24172455

#SPJ1

6 0

2 years ago