This is a big topic, so I can only start to give some positives and negatives:
Positives: it can provide a protection and it "saves" the things that worked: if it worked for a society before to have a special group of soldiers, this can be provided by a social structure: the society will have a group of soldiers and non-soldiers.
Negatives: it can carry on social injustices, such as when in India some people are "untouchables" and they cannot hold any jobs apart from the very worst ones (just as working with waste disposal).
Answer:
The option which weaken the conclusion drawn is:
E. All artists who receive grants and donations are completely dependent on that money to cover their daily expenses; without those funds, they would have to discontinue the practice of their art.
Explanation:
The conclusion drawn in the passage is that grants and donations are a bad things because they actually make artists lose the interest for work. The passage claims that artists only practice art because they need to survive.
<u>The option that weakens that conclusion is the one that goes against it. In that case, we should choose letter E, since it claims the opposite. It states that artists need the money they receive in the form of grants and donations. If they cannot cover their expenses, they cannot work. If grants and donations help them cove their expenses, they are able to work. Therefore, letter E is the best option.</u>
Answer:
in the past there was slavery ppl had the fight for there own right, now we still have to fight so that ppl dont have to wear mask or get the vaccine
Explanation:
Answer:
i think its B, b ut wait till more people answer it so you can know if im right
Explanation:
