Answer:
Beveridge supports the Open Door policy because of potential economic benefits, while Carnegie opposes it because of possible economic costs
Explanation:
According to the two passages in the debate over the United States’ Open Door policy in the late 1800s and early 1900s, the statement that best contrasts the two points of view between Beveridge and Carnegie is that Beveridge supports the Open Door policy because of potential economic benefits, while Carnegie opposes it because of possible economic costs
Network of farmer's organizations that worked for political & economic reforms in the late 1800s
the answer would be C) blaming the collapse of world trade and other economic failures on Jewish financiers.
Jus Genitum is the law of nation which is applicable over all the citizen of the nation, whereas jus civile is the law of civil, applicable over the particular state or people of the state.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Law of nations is generally treated among the category of international law which establishes the identity of citizen of the nation at global platform and deals with the cases between the international or foreign personnel against the citizen of the nation.
Law of civil, is the on the other hand, pertaining to the civil rights and duties of the state or the people of the state, where the cases are dealt at national platform. It deals with the cases between the two citizen of the same nation, may or may not be from different state of the nation. It may also be against a person with case against the state, but not against another nation.
Answer:
The economic lives of planters, former slaves, and nonslaveholding whites, were transformed after the Civil War.
Explanation: