1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
larisa86 [58]
3 years ago
13

How did colonization expand markets for European powers?

History
2 answers:
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Each person in a conquered region was also a potential customer

Explanation:

The colonization gave the European colonial powers great advantage and opportunity to get a lot of wealth. The reason for this was that they were able to get the natural resources and raw materials from their colonies for free. They had well established manufacturing plants, so they were manufacturing the natural resources and raw materials and turning them into final products. Then they used the people in their colonies to make more profit by selling them the manufactured goods. This worked perfectly well for the colonial powers, as they were the ones that had the industry and the materials to produce, while the people in the colonies where reliant on them for goods as they did not had anything to be able to compete with it.

Vera_Pavlovna [14]3 years ago
5 0

The answer is:

Each person in a conquered region was also a potential customer.

You might be interested in
What does each column show ?
Ket [755]
The chart is showing the differences and similarities between the opposers and supporters of the Alien and Sedition Acts
3 0
3 years ago
Honors world history
Mariulka [41]
The correct answer is A, NAFTA
8 0
3 years ago
What did Samuel Langley invent
zloy xaker [14]

He invented the Bolometer. An instrument capable of detecting minute differences in temperature

6 0
2 years ago
In 1994, the U.S., Canada, and Mexico joined to form the largest free trade area in the world, known as
Yuki888 [10]
Free Trade Area of the Americas began with the Summit of the Americas<span> in Miami, Florida, on December 11, 1994, but the FTAA came to public attention during the </span>Quebec City Summit of the Americas<span>, held in Canada in 2001</span><span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The data shown in the graphs best support the conclusion that the North
Novay_Z [31]

The correct answer is B. was better prepared economically to fight the Civil War.

Explanation:

The graphs show in the North the production of firearms, banks deposits, manufacture goods, among others was quite high in comparison to the South; for example, the North had the 97% production of firearms, while the South produced the remaining 3%. Moreover, this situation applied not only to production but also to workers and population; for example, the North had 92% of the Industrial Workers. This general situation meant the Noth was better prepared for the Civil War because they had a great advantage in the production of weapons and other products that were necessary for war, as well as more people.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which describes the Supreme Court's ruling in Dred Scott v.
    7·1 answer
  • Do you think the current trade wars have something to do with the ambitions of China? Why or Why not?
    10·1 answer
  • Facts about Wilson Churchill, please...? How he lead Britain to victory in ww2..
    14·1 answer
  • What is another word or phrase for an injunction
    7·1 answer
  • In a country with limited government:
    7·1 answer
  • How did the compromise of 1877 like to beginning of the end of reconstruction
    9·1 answer
  • List out the features of megalithic burial types.​
    10·1 answer
  • Why were colonies considered so important to the nations of Europe?
    7·2 answers
  • World War I brought enormous changes to warfare and to the lives of millions of people. Complete
    13·1 answer
  • 1
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!