Answer:
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were arguably the two most important leaders during the American Civil Rights Movement. Although both were dedicated to ending racial discrimination towards African Americans and achieving racial freedom, the two appeared to differ significantly in their ideology and tactics.
Aims: Martin Luther King was an integrationist, whose main aim was to bring about racial equality through both races mixing and working together. However, Malcolm X was a black nationalist with a firm belief in black supremacy. Although he also wanted civil rights, he championed black superiority over whites and wanted the races to be distinctly separated, as he remained suspicious of white people and believed that African Americans should only seek to help one another.
Tactics: The issue of how to achieve their goals also differed. To achieve racial equality, Martin Luther King believed non-violent resistance was the key to ending all violence and racial hatred, in order to eventually achieve equality between races. These non-violent tactics were evident during peaceful protests such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott 1955. Malcolm X on the other hand, believed that non-violent methods were too slow to achieve progress and signified weakness. He strongly believed in black pride and that African Americans should achieve their goals “by any means necessary”, advocating black militancy both as a form of self-defence and defiance against white aggression.
Explanation:
Answer:
Edith Eunice Therrel Wilmans
Explanation:
Edith Eunice Therrel Wilmans was the 1st women elected to the state of Texas legislature.
The hot seasons are short and its constantly cold there
Answer:
pursuing non violence would be a risk because it might not always work to solve issues and people might become violent to him and he'll get hurt
Explanation:
Sensible beauty pertains to the beauty of the person in their physical appearance while ethical beauty pertains to the beauty of the person's character or inner character where it does not rely on the outer image. The two are different in how they define beauty and how they are applied, the only thing that makes them similar is their similarities of trying to define what beauty means.
