The second Choice because it makes more sense
Answer:
A conclusion that is in favour:
"Using public money to maintain national landmarks is a good policy in the sense that a national landmark is a public good: no one can be excluded from enjoying the view of a national landmark like the Arch in St. Louis for example.
Because they are public goods, national landmarks are not likely to be profitable or provided by the private sector in a free market, and for this reason, government intervention in the form of public money becomes necessary".
Working out: 6.25% = 4 half lives (20x4=80ma) 80ma is how old the rock is
A third persons point of view is when a character is being introduced by their name for example "mark has no idea what you're talking about"
