Answer:
Serving as commander-in-chief: Under the Constitution, the president is the commander-in-chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, as well as of “the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual service of the United States” — in other words, the National Guard. The president does not have the power to declare war (that was left for Congress), but considering that the last formal declaration of war was in 1942, modern presidents certainly haven’t shied away from exercising their powers as commander-in-chief.
OR
Carrying out legislation: As the head of the executive branch of the federal government, the President is responsible for ensuring that all the nation’s laws are “faithfully executed.” In other words, the President carries out the legislation enacted by Congress but cannot initiate legislation himself. While constitutionally speaking the president is empowered only to sign or veto legislation that Congress sends to his desk, presidents have in recent years become more assertive in interpreting legislation through the use of signing statements. These statements often object to the provisions of a particular law on constitutional grounds and instruct executive branch officials how to implement the legislation according to the President’s interpretation.
Explanation:
Supporting the nomination of William Jennings Bryan as a democrat was both a positive and negative development for the People’s Party.
<u>Explanation:</u>
People’s party was found by the leaders of the Populist Movement which worked to safeguard the rights of farmers. It was formed in 1891 and in the presidential elections of 1892 its candidate James B Weaver got 8.5% votes. This attracted political attention towards the people’s party.
Democrats were impressed by the ideals and support gained by the People’s party they succeeded in gaining the support of People’s party in 1896 presidential elections when William Jennings Bryan was the Democrat candidate. Getting folded up to the Democratic Party increased the political exposure of People’s party.
The fusion wasn’t a healthy decision considering the scenario in the south. Approaches of Democrats were completely racist which meant there was a conflict between ideologies between the two parties. The influence of People’s Party was over by 1908.
It was lasted over 9 years from December 1979 to February 1989
Answer:
Answer is B
Explanation:
got it right on the test
please mark me brainliest
I think the answer is <span>b. the nationalists desire an end to foreign dependence.
Central America and South America did have their common colonizer, As part of the thirteen colonies of Britain.
South and North America tried their best to fight their mother colonizer who made high tax impositions and they won the war. But, the South did not agree with some other plans of the North which may affect their economy this pushed to Civil War.
Latin America also made its own uprising and national struggle which became their motivation to finally have their own national freedom
</span>
