Answer: $123,583.90
Explanation:
Given the following Parameters,
Net income = $120,226,
Interest rate = 9%
Tax = 30%
The following formula then applies,
Diluted EPS = (Net income + Interest after tax)/Total outstanding shares outstanding
Now, Interest(Before tax) = $53,300 * 0.09 = $4797
Now we have to calculate it After Tax
= 4,797 (1-tax rate)
= 4,797(1-0.3)
= $3,357.90
The numerator is,
= (Net income + Interest after tax)
= 120,226 + 3,357.90
= $123,583.90
The numerator in the diluted earnings per share calculation for 2018 would be $123,583.90
Answer:
d. requires employees to pay for more of their benefit costs
Explanation:
Costing is the measurement of the cost of production of goods and services by assessing the fixed costs and variable costs associated with each step of production.
In Financial accounting, a direct cost can be defined as any expense which can easily be connected to a specific cost object such as a department, project or product. Some examples of direct costs are cost of raw materials, machineries or equipments.
On the other hand, any cost associated with the running, operations and maintenance of a company refers to indirect costs. Some examples of indirect costs are utility bill, office accessories, diesel, etc.
Cost sharing can be defined as a process in which an employee makes payment for a portion of the cost he or she incurred, especially benefit costs.
In Business management, cost sharing requires employees to pay for more of their benefit costs.
The difference between collaborative consumption firms is that ZILOK PROVIDES INVENTORY WHICH ARE PROVIDED BY PARTICIPATING CITIZEN SUPPLIERS WHILE CHEGG OWNS ITS OWN INVENTORY.
Collaborative consumption is an economy system of decentralized networks and market places which unlock the value of underused assets by matching consumers in a manner which bypass middlemen. It is also called sharing economy. Zilok and Chegg are examples of collaborative firms.
Answer:
The correct answer is option c.
Explanation:
Prisoner's dilemma is a common concept in the game theory. It shows why two rational individuals will not cooperate. Two prisoner's have the choice to cooperate with each other and remain silent or blame the other.
The Nash equilibrium for both the payers here will be to betray each other. But this will incur cost on both of them. If the players could cooperate with each other, they would not agree to this.