Which is textual evidence of persistent determination? A) Endowed by nature with a robust constituion Eliminate B) The daily wor
k continued; nay, it actually increased; C) The brain was failing, and life was gently slipping away. D) She inquired with acute anxiety into all the details of the war;
B) The daily work continued; nay, it actually increased;
Something that is happening on a consistent basis. It also gives the feeling that it is work to make it persistent. In option B, the statement "daily work" indicates that something is done daily which supports the idea of persistent. The sentence containing the line "The daily work continued; nay, it actually increased" also includes the description "with an astonishing pertinacity." Pertinacity means persistent determination. The brain failing and life slipping away does not show any persistent determination. Also, the statement that she inquired with acute anxiety does not how any persistent determination.
<span>Forming ideas based on the text that are not explicitly stated in the text is inferring.
deduce or conclude from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements.Inferring is to develop by reasoning; terminate or judge from premises or evidence</span>
Answer: Third-person omniscient shows us what many characters in the story are thinking and feeling third person limited point of view sticks closely to one character in the story. Using third person limited point of view doesn't mean you tell the story entirely from the one character's perspective using I.
