<em>In Bernard Shaw’s Pygmalion, there is a distinct variance in class relations and the way that early 20th century Britains were perceived as being different by their speech, money, wealth, style, manners, and appearance. Being a lady or a gentleman was an acquired status desirable among most of London’s society.</em>
Answer:
The structure had four main classes: the Nobility, the Gentry, the Yeomanry, and the poor.
-Nobility:
Who belonged?:
Noblemen and Woman.
There were few nobles, for they acted as a threat to the monarch's power. If you were to be a part of the nobility class you were either born into it or given a grant by a king or queen. It takes high crime and treason to lose their title.
-The Gentry:
Who belonged?:
Knights, squires, gentlemen and gentlewomen whose fortunes were great enough were they did not have to work very hard for a living.
Many of them could start off as a knight, yet through marriages and generations they could build their wealth and class
-The Yeomanry
Who belonged?:
These people made up the middle class
All of them could live in a comfortable position of life, yet if famine struck they could lose everything. While the Gentry used all of their wealth on homes and such things as finary, the Yeomanry prefered to spend it more modestly.
-The Poor
Who belonged?:
These people made up the poor class of england.
They were left with no money, food, or shelter. Their numbers always increased gradually so there were laws set to assist them.
I hope this helps(:
Explanation:
In Pygmalion, we observe a society divided, separated by language, education, and wealth. Shaw gives us a chance to see how that gap can be bridged, both successfully and unsuccessfully. As he portrays it, London society cannot simply be defined by two terms, "rich" and "poor."
Within each group there are smaller less obvious distinctions, and it is in the middle, in that gray area between wealth and poverty that many of the most difficult questions arise and from which the most surprising truths emerge.
Answer:
hope you like it
Explanation:
The theme of "The Most Dangerous Game" is civilization versus savagery. Its main characters, Sangor Rainsford and General Zaroff, are both hunters, and Rainsford justifies killing by claiming that animals can't feel. This logic fails, however, when Zaroff starts hunting humans.
The Most Dangerous Game Themes
Civilization and Community. As the story of an aristocrat who hunts the shipwrecked men that wash ashore on his private island, “The Most Dangerous Game” challenges the idea that highbrow pastimes and aristocratic society are synonymous with being civilized or moral. ...
Condoned Violence vs. Murder. ...
Extreme Social Darwinism.
