1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ostrovityanka [42]
2 years ago
12

Why was the transfer of power after the election 1800 significant? It set the precedent that political parties would always chal

lenge the results of the election to make sure the transfer of power was legitimate. It set the precedent that intense campaign elections hurt the peaceful transfer of power and should be avoided. It set the precedent that elections should never be decided by the House of Representatives because that threatened a peaceful transfer of power. It set the precedent that the losing faction would accept the election results and help with a peaceful power transfer.
History
1 answer:
IgorC [24]2 years ago
8 0

Considering the available options, the reason the transfer of power after the election 1800 was significant is that "<u>It set the precedent that the losing faction would accept the election results and help with a peaceful power transfer."</u>

<h3>The United States Presidential Election of 1800</h3>

Following the Presidential election of 1800, the incumbent party, the Federalist Party, lost the election to the Democratic-Republican Party.

John Adams was the incumbent President that lost the election to Thomas Jefferson and yet calmly transferred power to the election winner.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that a correct answer is an option. D. <u>"It set the precedent that the losing faction would accept the election results and help with a peaceful power transfer."</u>

Learn more about US Election here: brainly.com/question/13474496

You might be interested in
How many religions did The kingdom of Aksum have
Grace [21]

Answer:

325

Explanation:

Christianity. Aksum embraced the Orthodox tradition of Christianity in the 4th century (c. 340–356 C.E.) under the rule of King Ezana. The king had been converted by Frumentius, a former Syrian captive who was made Bishop of Aksum.

8 0
3 years ago
How did Boris Yeltsin respond to the Communist coup attempt?
Masteriza [31]

Answer: the answer is B.

Explanation: he told the russians that the coup was bad.

5 0
3 years ago
How do u make 1/2 in to a whole number?
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

1/2x2=1

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Does the freedom of speech mean you can say whatever you want,whenever you want ?
ValentinkaMS [17]

  No, the freedom of speech is one of the most important rights in a democracy along with the freedom of press. It allows several voices to rise and be heard. But it does not means that you can say whatever you want whenever you want.

  You can find the foundations of the freedom of speech in the first amendment where it says:

<em>"Amendment I </em>

<em> </em>

<em>Congress </em><em>shall make no law </em><em>respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or </em><em>abridging the freedom of speech</em><em>, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances"  </em>

 But there are exceptions to the rule. You can´t say whatever you want as the supreme court have showed in several cases. From this we can extract some categories where the first amendment doesn´t work:

  • Incitement: When its directed to inciting or producing inminent lawless action.
  • False statements of facts: there are some types of this unprotected according to the supreme court: those said with <em>"sufficiently culpable mental state" </em>can be subject of criminal or civil liability. Secondly libel and slander and finally negligent statements or facts can be subject of civil liability.
  • Offensinve speech

  As a conclusion we can say that the freedom of speech is a fundamental right in a healthy democracy but we must take care of it. We can´t say whatever we want, well actually we can but you have to be responsible of your acts.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement is true?
podryga [215]

Answer:

A is the correct answer

Explain:

You can easily rule out D because there are still conflicts to this day. Now you have it easier to get the right answer. WW2 was the first truly modern war, in the civil war and evem WW1 they still waited to see the whites of peoples eyes before they fired.  And the majority of the battles were actually fought in the north.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In an effort to deal with an increasing number of immigrants, in 1892 the U.S. government
    10·2 answers
  • Read the following passage and answer the question:
    11·1 answer
  • This political cartoon is from 1915: A political cartoon shows a political boss conducting a chorus with a woman wearing a dress
    10·2 answers
  • Automobiles were luxury items owned by few until what
    5·1 answer
  • Trace the impact of World War I on the Prohibition movement. Arrange the events in
    7·2 answers
  • What effect did the geography of mesopotamia have on trade?
    13·2 answers
  • Questions 1 through 5
    13·2 answers
  • The first europen to trade to discover a new sea route to India were the​
    13·1 answer
  • What year did the trail by ordeal start and end? ​
    13·2 answers
  • What details did President Washington and the
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!