1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rewona [7]
4 years ago
6

In the 1800’s, Britain and the United States had laws against unionizing mainly because they believed unions...

History
2 answers:
taurus [48]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

During XIX century, several laws were enacted in Great Britain and the United States in order to prevent unionizing. For instance, in Britain he Combination Act was issued since 1799.

These laws had as main goal preventing strikes and the expansion of Marxists ideology. Back in that time, bussinessmen were terrified before facing the possibility of a big socialist outbreak among the workers in US and Great Britain.

Explanation:

qaws [65]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

would be bad for the economy.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which political leader is described above?
Lerok [7]
James Wilson

Hope this helps :))
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What act removed the barriers of voting 1965 and increased the participation of black voters?
enot [183]
The act is called the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

This act, signed into law by Lyndon B. Johnson, helped to remove legal barriers that African-Americans faced when it came to voting. For example, African-Americans were unfair targets of things like literacy tests, poll taxes, and the grandfather clause. All three of these barriers were put in place to limit the amount of African-American citizens voting in local, state, and national elections.

This law ensured that African-Americans received the same protection guaranteed to them under the 15th amendment.
3 0
4 years ago
Some one report my question that have to photo of me and my little brother lol ollzzzz
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

Ok

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Qhy does one party rule matter to totalitarian states
12345 [234]

The totalitarian states usually don't allow any opposition parties to exist. If some people try to form a party, they usually end up in prison, are banished from the nation, or even murdered.

The reason why the totalitarian rulers prefer a one party system is in order to have all the power in the country, without having opposition that will constantly go public about the terrors and injustices that are happening. If there are more parties, than the people will start to support them, especially cause rarely who likes to live under a totalitarian ruler, thus the totalitarian ruler will face a situation where he/she will lose its power.

3 0
3 years ago
All of the following are true statements about the Triangular Trade, EXCEPT:
Valentin [98]
The to the question is C
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Have people made an apple computer yet?
    15·2 answers
  • How was james, the duke of york, able to claim new netherlands for england?
    5·1 answer
  • in a paragraph or two, compare and contrast trade in early empires with trade today. can someone help me?
    13·2 answers
  • What is the percentage of democrats in dallas 2008?
    14·1 answer
  • James Meredith took his case against the University of Mississippi to
    5·2 answers
  • Someone who wants to make a safe (not risky) investment might consider putting his or her money into____or_____. a) Stocks, the
    7·1 answer
  • The root word mit means "send." What prefix can you add to create a word meaning "to send across"? (5 points) Inter Over Semi Tr
    8·2 answers
  • Which nations in Africa and Asia were 'colonized'?​
    8·1 answer
  • What were the social and economic changes of the civil war
    14·1 answer
  • How did the citizens of Ancient Rome vote?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!