Answer:
No, his inference is not valid
Step-by-step explanation:
the data shown represents the statistic of 100 people's preferred ways to view movies in total
out of that 30/100 people prefer to watch in theatre.
trent inferences that out of 400 people 300 would prefer to watch in theatre another way to write this is 300/400
if we multiply the data we're given so that the denominators match Trent's inference. The data tells us that 120/400 would prefer to watch in theatre, so his inference is not valid.
Answer:
d. 1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
The common ratio will be the ratio of any two adjacent terms:
(3/12)/(3/3) = (1/4)/1 = 1/4
Part (a)
<h3>
Answer: Ø</h3>
This is the empty set
------------------
Explanation:
It doesn't matter what set A is composed of. Intersecting any set with the empty set Ø will always result in the empty set.
This is because we're asking the question: "What does some set A and the empty set have in common?". The answer of course being "nothing" because there's nothing in Ø. Not even the value zero is in this set.
We can write Ø as { } which is a set of curly braces with nothing inside it.
=========================================================
Part (b)
<h3>Answer: {1,2,3,4,5,6}</h3>
-----------------
Explanation:
When you union the universal set with any other set, you'll get the universal set.
The rule is where I've made B the universal set to avoid confusion of the letter U and the union symbol which looks nearly identical.
Why does this rule work? Well if an item is in set , then it's automatically in set U (everything is in set U; it's the universe). So we're not adding anything to the universe when applying a union involving this largest set.
It's like saying
- A = set of stuff inside a persons house
- = set of stuff outside a persons house (ie stuff that is not in set A)
- U = set of every item
we can see that will basically form the set of every item, aka the universal set.