Richard went gallently off to war, leaving his brother, an incompetent ruler, in his stead. John was so bad that the Magna Carter was signed on his watch. That was helpful because it took some of the monarch's power away. It didn't help everyone since it only gave rights to some of the nobility, but it was a start.
That was one effect of the crusades in England. Richard the Lionhearted likely would have had the same difficulties that John had to cope with. Richard was not a great politician (he put rebellions down with force), but he was a very gifted military technician. John faced the problem of having not much of an army to resist those wanting him to sign the Magna Carta. That should get you started.
The first slaves were introduced into the English-American colonies by a Dutch trader, who, in 1619, sold twenty of them to the settlers at Jamestown, Va.
A cloud was ascending, the appearance of which I cannot give you are more exact description of than by likening it to that of a pine tree for it shot out to a great height in the form of a vary tall trunk, which itself pit all the top into a sort of branches.
It was written by a famous historian who witnessed the event. -Letter to Cornelius Tacitus, Pliny the younger.
<h3>
Who was Cornelius Tacitus?</h3>
Tacitus, whose full name is Publius Cornelius Tacitus or Gaius Cornelius Tacitus, was a Roman orator and public figure who lived from 56 AD to 120 AD. He is regarded as one of the finest Latin prose stylists and historians. His writings include the Germania, which describes the Germanic tribes, the Historiae (Histories), which covers the Roman Empire between AD 69 and 96, and the later Annals, which covers the empire between AD 14 and 68.
- Because he was cognizant of his literary stylistic choices, his work was given life by the way he thought and expressed himself. Greek historiography had established techniques for telling the past: one may explain historical events simply, use characters to set the atmosphere, or emphasize the dramatic appeal of human behavior.
- The more accomplished writer may incorporate parts from all three techniques, albeit each method had its own. After years of development, the Roman "annalistic" form permitted this dynamic play of style in important events. Tacitus had studied the early Roman historiographer Sallust as a role model and was familiar with the tactics and how to control them for his political views.
- The reader is finally impressed by his skillful use of literary Latin. He used the serious and lyrical Roman heritage to help him write in a magnificent style, and he made use of the Latin language's power, rhythm, and color. Like his thoughts, his mannered avoids false smoothness.
To know more about Cornelius Tacitus please click here : brainly.com/question/18109498
#SPJ9
Answer:
The answer is: No it wasn't.
Explanation:
The economics of slavery and political control of that system that was central to the conflict.
Main reasons:
States' rights-They wanted to avoid federal laws, especially laws interfering with the South's right to keep slaves and take them wherever they wished
Territorial expansion--the newly formed Republican party, whose members were strongly opposed to the westward expansion of slavery into new states
Secession--They felt excluded from the political system , and decided to withdraw themselves. All these led to war.
