first: A PARSEE BAKES A CAKE
second: A RHINO. COMES ALONG AND CHASES THE PARSEE UP A TREE
third: THE RHINO. EATS THE CAKE WHILE THE PARSEE IS UP IN THE TREE
fourth: WEEKS PASS AND THE RHINO NEVER APOLOGIZES
fifth: THE RHINO. TAKES OFF HIS SKIN AND GOES TO THE RED SEA TO BATHE
sixth: THE PARSEE NOTICES THE RHINOS SKIN
seventh: THE PARSEE GETS DRIED CAKE CRUMBS AND PUTS THEM ON THE RHINOS SKIN.
eighth:
THE RHINO GRTS OUT OF THE WATER AND PUTS ON HIS SKIN
ninth: THE RHINO BEGINS ITCHING AND SCRATCHING HIMSELF SO MUCH THAT HE LOOSES HIS BUTTONS AND HIS SKIN BECOMES ALL WRINKLY
final: THE PARSEE LAUGHS AND RHINO GOES AWAY GRUMPY AND WRINKLY
hope this helps:)
The answer to your question is D
Answer:
need points
Explanation:
need poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinstneed poinst
The author's strongest support for their statement is the reference to a major claim (Option B). In it, the author alludes to the strongest and clearest declaration that agrees with their statement by quoting the authors of Suburban Nation. This is not an allusion because of the direct nature of this reference (allusion = indirect reference). There is no repetition observed in this paragraph, and the author doesn't comment on what the opposing party believes. Therefore, by logic and by elimination, we can conclude that this is an example of a reference to a major claim.
It depends on what you mean by "stuck in a conversation".
If I were in a conversation I didn't want to be in, I would give the situation some time, but if it kept dragging on I would make up some reason to leave.
If I were in a debate and I was losing, I would probably try and find a better way to explain my point. :)
